Testing out another command parser.

This one seems like it will be good, but there appears to be a bug with
it sadly. https://github.com/lexicalscope/jewelcli/issues/28

pom.xml

@@ -73,6 +73,12 @@
 			<version>1.32</version>
 		</dependency>
 		
+		<dependency>
+			<groupId>com.lexicalscope.jewelcli</groupId>
+			<artifactId>jewelcli</artifactId>
+			<version>0.8.8</version>
+		</dependency>
+
 		<!-- Start of Test Dependencies -->
 		<dependency>
 			<groupId>junit</groupId>

src/main/java/com/graywolf336/jail/command/jewel/Jailing.java

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+package com.graywolf336.jail.command.jewel;
+
+import java.util.List;
+
+import com.lexicalscope.jewel.cli.Option;
+
+public interface Jailing {
+	@Option(shortName={"player", "pl", "p"})
+	String getPlayer();
+	
+	@Option(shortName="c")
+	String getCell();
+	
+	@Option(shortName="r")
+	List<String> getReason();
+}

src/test/java/test/java/com/graywolf336/jail/TestJewel.java

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+package test.java.com.graywolf336.jail;
+
+import junit.framework.Assert;
+
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+import com.graywolf336.jail.command.jewel.Jailing;
+import com.lexicalscope.jewel.cli.CliFactory;
+
+public class TestJewel {
+	@Test
+	public void testJewel() {
+		String[] args = { "--player", "graywolf336", "-c", "testing", "-r", "This", "is", "a", "reason" };
+		Jailing j = CliFactory.parseArguments(Jailing.class, args);
+		
+		Assert.assertEquals("graywolf336", j.getPlayer());
+		Assert.assertEquals("testing", j.getCell());
+		
+		StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
+		for(String s : j.getReason()) {
+			sb.append(s).append(' ');
+		}
+		
+		sb.deleteCharAt(sb.length() - 1);
+		
+		Assert.assertEquals("This is a reason", sb.toString());
+	}
+}